Scientists find safer way to hunt for pandemic viruses
Researchers have developed a safer and more effective method to predict which animal viruses pose the greatest pandemic risk to humans. Published in Nature, the study introduces a technique that allows scientists to screen vast numbers of viruses without handling dangerous pathogens. The approach focuses on identifying whether animal viruses can bind to human cell receptors, a critical first step required for a virus to infect people. The research team, based in the UK, investigated the alphacoronavirus family. This group includes common cold viruses and is closely related to betacoronaviruses like SARS-CoV-2. While the entry receptors for most alphacoronaviruses remain unknown, the team utilized genomic sequences to identify spike proteins, the structures viruses use to attach to cells. To ensure safety, the scientists created pseudotyped viruses. These are harmless particles that display the spike proteins of real viruses but lack the ability to replicate. This allows researchers to test binding capabilities without exposure to live, potentially lethal strains. Testing revealed that while most alphacoronaviruses could not bind to human cells, one specific virus, known as KY43, showed strong binding affinity to a protein found on human cells. KY43 was previously identified in heart-nosed bats in Kenya. Although related viruses exist globally, only those from a specific region in East Africa demonstrate the ability to bind effectively to human receptors. Currently, there is no evidence that people in the region where KY43 was found have been infected. Nevertheless, the study highlights KY43 as a virus that warrants close monitoring. It is important to note that binding to a receptor is merely the first hurdle. A virus must overcome numerous other biological barriers to cause an infection and spread. However, this work serves as a powerful proof of concept for pre-pandemic risk assessment. By relying on genomic data rather than live viruses, scientists can safely screen any virus for which a sequence exists. This methodology can potentially be adapted to evaluate other stages of viral infection, providing a comprehensive toolkit for identifying threats before they emerge. The study underscores that while the world is teeming with animal viruses, the vast majority will never infect humans. This new screening method offers a strategic way to distinguish the few that do pose a significant risk, allowing public health officials to focus resources on the most dangerous candidates. By shifting the focus to safer, sequence-based analysis, the scientific community can better prepare for the next potential pandemic.
