Learning With Noisy Labels On Cifar 10N Worst

評価指標

Accuracy (mean)

評価結果

このベンチマークにおける各モデルのパフォーマンス結果

モデル名
Accuracy (mean)
Paper TitleRepository
Co-Teaching83.83Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labels-
ELR83.58Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labels-
GNL86.99Partial Label Supervision for Agnostic Generative Noisy Label Learning-
T-Revision80.48Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?-
JoCoR83.37Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularization-
PSSCL95.12PSSCL: A progressive sample selection framework with contrastive loss designed for noisy labels
PGDF93.65Sample Prior Guided Robust Model Learning to Suppress Noisy Labels-
CE77.69--
Negative-LS82.99Understanding Generalized Label Smoothing when Learning with Noisy Labels-
Forward-T79.79Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approach-
Co-Teaching+83.26How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?-
F-div82.53When Optimizing $f$-divergence is Robust with Label Noise-
ProMix96.16ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utility-
GCE80.66Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labels-
Divide-Mix92.56DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learning-
CAL85.36Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labels-
VolMinNet80.53Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Points-
CORES83.60Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approach-
ELR+91.09Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labels-
Peer Loss82.53Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Rates-
0 of 25 row(s) selected.
Learning With Noisy Labels On Cifar 10N Worst | SOTA | HyperAI超神経