With the concept of "vibe coding" gaining popularity, an increasing number of startups are attempting to lower the barriers to software development, enabling users to rapidly build applications without mastering programming knowledge. Recently, multiple platforms have launched related tools claiming that users can generate usable products within minutes by providing just one idea and access via free credits. Against a backdrop of sustained capital inflow, this sector has also sparked discussions regarding product differentiation and commercial sustainability. In an evaluation, three users with different technical backgrounds tested three mainstream tools—Cursor, Lovable, and Base44—and attempted to develop a writing assistant, a news editing panel, and an image assessment application. Overall, Lovable and Base44 offer more "zero-threshold" user experiences. These platforms guide users through chatbot-like interactions using natural language descriptions to request features, generating complete applications in mere minutes. Testers generally found these tools easy to pick up with low learning costs, capable of completing the entire process from conception to deployment within ten minutes. However, their functional details and scalability remain limited, requiring iterative prompting for continuous optimization. By contrast, Cursor aligns more closely with professional development environments. Its feature design emphasizes control over the code generation process—for instance, requiring user authorization for local operations and step-by-step confirmation of generated instructions—as well as incorporating concepts like Next.js and React tech stacks. Although it presents a steeper learning curve, its outputs exhibit structures and extensibility closer to real-world product development workflows, making them better suited for users possessing some technical foundation. Testing further revealed differences among platforms regarding their "free credit" mechanisms. While Lovable performed closest to user expectations during initial generation phases, it consumed credits relatively quickly. Base44 demonstrated superior efficiency in resource utilization. Meanwhile, due to operational complexity, some users testing Cursor failed to complete full development cycles altogether. In summary, current vibe coding tools are undergoing rapid growth, with numerous market participants driving divergent product positioning: one category prioritizes usability and speed, while another targets more specialized development needs. As additional enterprises enter the field, this domain may face intensified competition and consolidation. Nevertheless, its vision—"enabling non-programmers to build applications"—is already being validated through practical experience.