U.S. Representative Anna Paulina Luna of Florida has firmly rejected claims that her office utilized artificial intelligence to draft legislative text for a major defense funding measure. The clarification follows viral circulation on X of a screenshot showing an AI-generated summary for an amendment to the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act. The circulated text, which appeared to be processed by the Claude language model, outlined directives for designating Department of Defense operations along the southwest border as a named initiative. Initial remarks from Luna’s office inadvertently amplified speculation regarding AI-assisted lawmaking. In a social media post, Luna acknowledged that staff had employed generative tools to review draft language, noting that such technological assistance was commonplace among congressional workers and emphasizing the need for careful human oversight. This statement prompted immediate debate on social media platforms about the extent of AI integration in federal legislation. Responding to the backlash, Luna revised her statement to draw a clear distinction between auxiliary drafting support and substantive legislative authorship. She confirmed that AI was utilized exclusively for spell-checking and grammar review on the amendment summary document, not on the actual statutory text. Luna reiterated that no legislative measures are ever drafted using artificial intelligence within her office. She further explained that all formal bill text originating from the House of Representatives is exclusively authored by the House Legislative Council, an office bound by institutional rules that prohibit the use of generative AI tools in lawmaking. The incident underscores ongoing tensions within Congress regarding the integration of emerging technologies into legislative processes. While congressional staff routinely adopt AI for research, communication, and administrative tasks, the formal drafting and amendment of federal statutes remain strictly human-driven processes governed by institutional protocols. Luna’s clarification serves as a direct rebuttal to viral misinformation while reinforcing existing House procedures that maintain human oversight at the core of legislative authorship.