Ecg Denoising On Qt Nstdb
Metriken
CosSim
MAD
PRD(%)
SSD
Ergebnisse
Leistungsergebnisse verschiedener Modelle zu diesem Benchmark
Vergleichstabelle
| Modellname | CosSim | MAD | PRD(%) | SSD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mecg-e-mamba-based-ecg-enhancer-for-baseline | 0.936 ±0.077 | 0.319 ±0.252 | 37.613 ±22.389 | 3.445 ±6.493 |
| deepfilter-an-ecg-baseline-wander-removal-1 | 0.895 ±0.101 | 0.395 ±0.282 | 50.570 ±30.703 | 5.302 ±8.400 |
| deep-recurrent-neural-networks-for-ecg-signal | 0.746 ±0.192 | 0.648 ±0.390 | 118.969 ±101.215 | 11.492 ±15.536 |
| descod-ecg-deep-score-based-diffusion-model | 0.926 ±0.086 | 0.329 ±0.258 | 39.940 ±25.343 | 3.800 ±6.227 |