Video Retrieval On Fivr 200K
Métriques
mAP (CSVR)
mAP (DSVR)
mAP (ISVR)
Résultats
Résultats de performance de divers modèles sur ce benchmark
Tableau comparatif
| Nom du modèle | mAP (CSVR) | mAP (DSVR) | mAP (ISVR) |
|---|---|---|---|
| visil-fine-grained-spatio-temporal-video | 0.797 | 0.843 | 0.660 |
| context-encoding-for-video-retrieval-with | 0.553 | 0.570 | 0.473 |
| dns-distill-and-select-for-efficient-and | 0.863 | 0.909 | 0.729 |
| visil-fine-grained-spatio-temporal-video | 0.792 | 0.833 | 0.654 |
| vrag-region-attention-graphs-for-content | 0.678 | 0.723 | 0.554 |
| visil-fine-grained-spatio-temporal-video | 0.854 | 0.899 | 0.723 |
| dns-distill-and-select-for-efficient-and | 0.558 | 0.574 | 0.476 |
| self-supervised-video-similarity-learning | 0.879 | 0.927 | 0.746 |
| exploring-the-temporal-cues-to-enhance-video | 0.833 | 0.896 | 0.674 |
| context-encoding-for-video-retrieval-with | 0.830 | 0.877 | 0.703 |
| context-encoding-for-video-retrieval-with | 0.698 | 0.728 | 0.592 |
| visil-fine-grained-spatio-temporal-video | 0.841 | 0.892 | 0.702 |
| vvs-video-to-video-retrieval-with-irrelevant | 0.689 | 0.711 | 0.590 |
| self-supervised-video-similarity-learning | 0.878 | 0.925 | 0.739 |
| dns-distill-and-select-for-efficient-and | 0..875 | 0.921 | 0.741 |
| vrag-region-attention-graphs-for-content | 0.470 | 0.484 | 0.399 |
| lamv-learning-to-align-and-match-videos-with | 0.466 | 0.496 | 0.371 |