Pedestrian Detection On Tju Ped Campus
Métriques
ALL (miss rate)
HO (miss rate)
R (miss rate)
R+HO (miss rate)
RS (miss rate)
Résultats
Résultats de performance de divers modèles sur ce benchmark
Tableau comparatif
| Nom du modèle | ALL (miss rate) | HO (miss rate) | R (miss rate) | R+HO (miss rate) | RS (miss rate) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pedestrian-detection-by-exemplar-guided | 34.87 | 65.27 | 24.84 | 32.39 | - |
| focal-loss-for-dense-object-detection | 44.34 | 71.31 | 34.73 | 42.26 | 82.99 |
| feature-pyramid-networks-for-object-detection | 38.08 | 73.14 | 27.92 | 35.67 | 67.52 |
| detection-in-crowded-scenes-one-proposal | 35.90 | 66.38 | 25.73 | 33.63 | - |
| fcos-fully-convolutional-one-stage-object | 41.62 | 81.28 | 31.89 | 39.38 | 69.04 |