Image Based Localization On Cvact
Métriques
Recall@1
Recall@1 (%)
Recall@10
Recall@5
Résultats
Résultats de performance de divers modèles sur ce benchmark
Tableau comparatif
| Nom du modèle | Recall@1 | Recall@1 (%) | Recall@10 | Recall@5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| each-part-matters-local-patterns-facilitate | 79.99 | 97.03 | 92.56 | 90.63 |
| simple-effective-and-general-a-new-backbone | 89.21 | 98.74 | 97.04 | 96.07 |
| cv-cities-advancing-cross-view-geo | 92.59 | 98.72 | 97.82 | 97.16 |
| transgeo-transformer-is-all-you-need-for | 84.95 | 98.37 | 95.78 | 94.14 |
| joint-representation-learning-and-keypoint | 40.53 | 89.12 | - | - |
| sample4geo-hard-negative-sampling-for-cross | 90.81 | 98.77 | 97.48 | 96.74 |
| beyond-geo-localization-fine-grained | 86.21 | 98.77 | 96.72 | 95.44 |
| joint-representation-learning-and-keypoint | 35.24 | 87.34 | - | - |