Google's latest AI model report lacks key safety details, experts say. Just a few weeks after launching its most powerful AI model to date, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Google released a technical report on Thursday that detailed its internal safety assessments. However, experts are raising concerns because the report is too sparse, failing to provide essential information needed to understand the model's potential risks fully. Technical reports typically include extensive data on AI model performance and safety, which is crucial for researchers, technicians, and the general public. This information helps people grasp the possible impacts of such models. Unfortunately, Google's report falls short in its description of key safety details, making it challenging to assess the model's potential risks. Experts argue that this lack of transparency could undermine the company's credibility, especially as AI technology garners increasing public attention. Moreover, the testing methods and evaluation criteria mentioned in the report are somewhat vague and lack clear data support. Experts recommend that Google enhance the transparency of its technical reports by providing more experimental details and test results. This would not only bolster user confidence in the product but also contribute to the overall health and development of the AI industry. By offering a more comprehensive and detailed report, Google can address the concerns of experts and the broader community, ensuring that its AI models are both safe and reliable. This approach not only benefits users but also aligns with the growing demand for responsible and ethical AI development.