Albania has launched a bold and unprecedented initiative in its fight against corruption: the creation of Diella, a virtual minister designed to oversee public procurement, licensing, and contracting. Introduced by Prime Minister Edi Rama, Diella is presented as an impartial, data-driven entity immune to political pressure, personal favors, or threats—relying solely on algorithms and objective criteria to award government contracts. This move marks a significant shift in a country long plagued by patronage and corruption since emerging from decades of Stalinist rule in 1991. With aspirations of joining the European Union, Albania is pursuing a comprehensive reform agenda, and transparency in public spending has become a top priority. Diella is positioned as a cornerstone of this effort, aiming to deliver what Rama calls “100% corruption-free procurement.” Launched earlier this year as part of the e-Albania digital government platform, Diella operates as an AI-powered assistant that analyzes vast amounts of data to evaluate bids, detect anomalies, and ensure compliance with established rules. By automating key decision-making processes, the system reduces the risk of human bias and manipulation, offering a potential model for other nations grappling with similar challenges. However, the project raises important questions about accountability and oversight. While Diella can process data with speed and consistency, the algorithms themselves must be transparent, auditable, and regularly reviewed. Who defines the criteria? How are disputes resolved? What mechanisms exist for public scrutiny or appeal? These are critical issues, especially in a political environment where digital transformation is both a tool for progress and a source of controversy. Rama, who has led the country for over a decade and is seeking a fourth term, has positioned digitalization as a central pillar of his vision for Albania’s future. His government’s push for AI-driven governance is ambitious, but not without criticism. Some worry that centralized control over digital systems could concentrate power rather than distribute it. Still, Diella represents a tangible attempt to use technology to strengthen democratic institutions. If implemented with transparency, public oversight, and safeguards, it could serve as a powerful example of how artificial intelligence, when responsibly applied, can enhance fairness and trust in government. The real test will not be in the technology alone, but in the systems built around it—ensuring that Diella’s decisions are explainable, accountable, and ultimately, trusted by the public.