OpenAI is facing intense criticism for its newly introduced parental controls, with experts and users alike arguing the measures fall short in protecting teenagers while treating adult users with excessive suspicion. Critics, including suicide prevention specialists, say the company’s approach fails to strike a balance between safety and autonomy, especially for young users. The updated system, which allows parents to monitor and restrict access to certain features in ChatGPT, has drawn backlash for being overly intrusive and poorly designed. Many users argue that the controls assume teens are incapable of responsible AI use, undermining their agency. “Treat us like adults,” one teenager posted on social media, echoing a sentiment shared widely across online forums. Experts in adolescent mental health warn that the current model may do more harm than good. They point out that blanket monitoring can alienate teens who are already struggling, discouraging them from seeking help through AI tools that could support their well-being. Instead of fostering open dialogue, the system may push vulnerable youth toward less transparent or unregulated platforms. Additionally, critics highlight that the parental controls are not mandatory, meaning many parents may not even enable them—leaving teens exposed to harmful content without adequate safeguards. At the same time, adult users are subjected to increased scrutiny and restrictions, such as delayed responses or blocked features, simply because they’re not verified as parents. Suicide prevention advocates stress that AI tools can be powerful resources for mental health support when used responsibly. However, they caution that overly restrictive systems risk blocking access to crucial help. “We need solutions that protect without punishing, guide without controlling,” said Dr. Elena Torres, a clinical psychologist specializing in youth mental health. OpenAI has defended the controls as a step toward safer AI use, emphasizing that they are optional and designed to give parents peace of mind. But many remain unconvinced, calling for a more nuanced approach—one that prioritizes education, consent, and trust over surveillance. As AI becomes increasingly woven into daily life, the debate over how to protect young users without eroding their autonomy is only intensifying.