HyperAI
Home
News
Latest Papers
Tutorials
Datasets
Wiki
SOTA
LLM Models
GPU Leaderboard
Events
Search
About
English
HyperAI
Toggle sidebar
Search the site…
⌘
K
Home
SOTA
Node Classification
Node Classification On Coauthor Physics
Node Classification On Coauthor Physics
Metrics
Accuracy
Results
Performance results of various models on this benchmark
Columns
Model Name
Accuracy
Paper Title
Repository
GNNMoE(GCN-like P)
97.03±0.13
Mixture of Experts Meets Decoupled Message Passing: Towards General and Adaptive Node Classification
LinkDist
96.87%
Distilling Self-Knowledge From Contrastive Links to Classify Graph Nodes Without Passing Messages
CoLinkDist
97.05%
Distilling Self-Knowledge From Contrastive Links to Classify Graph Nodes Without Passing Messages
Exphormer
96.89±0.09%
Exphormer: Sparse Transformers for Graphs
GNNMoE(SAGE-like P)
96.81±0.22
Mixture of Experts Meets Decoupled Message Passing: Towards General and Adaptive Node Classification
DAGNN (Ours)
94
Towards Deeper Graph Neural Networks
GCN
97.46 ± 0.10
Classic GNNs are Strong Baselines: Reassessing GNNs for Node Classification
3ference
97.22%
Inferring from References with Differences for Semi-Supervised Node Classification on Graphs
GraphMix (GCN)
94.49 ± 0.84
GraphMix: Improved Training of GNNs for Semi-Supervised Learning
CoLinkDistMLP
96.87%
Distilling Self-Knowledge From Contrastive Links to Classify Graph Nodes Without Passing Messages
LinkDistMLP
96.91%
Distilling Self-Knowledge From Contrastive Links to Classify Graph Nodes Without Passing Messages
GNNMoE(GAT-like P)
97.05±0.19
Mixture of Experts Meets Decoupled Message Passing: Towards General and Adaptive Node Classification
NCSAGE
98.69 ± 0.26
Clarify Confused Nodes via Separated Learning
NCGCN
98.63 ± 0.24
Clarify Confused Nodes via Separated Learning
0 of 14 row(s) selected.
Previous
Next